<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ndmckinney&#124;net &#187; patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ndmckinney.net/tag/patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net</link>
	<description>In the Army now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bribery or Business?</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2010/02/15/bribery-or-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2010/02/15/bribery-or-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2010/02/15/bribery-or-business/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Second Circuit is deciding whether or not the practice of &#8220;reverse payments&#8221; &#8212; settlement in patent infringement cases where the patent holder pays the alleged infringer to stay off the market &#8212; are subject to antitrust scrutiny. Interesting concept, but my gut feeling is that the practice is anticompetitive. It&#8217;s remarkably similar to what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2010/02/15/bribery-or-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Victory Against the Rule of Law</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/07/a-victory-against-the-rule-of-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/07/a-victory-against-the-rule-of-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceuticals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/07/a-victory-against-the-rule-of-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a decision issued Monday, 6 August, an Indian court has rejected Novartis&#8217; patent claims on Glivec. While Doctors Without Borders (MSF) claims that this is a &#8220;major victory&#8221; for accessibility of medicines in developing countries, I believe India is the only real winner in this case. Novartis was already subsidizing the use of Glivec [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/07/a-victory-against-the-rule-of-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

