<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ndmckinney&#124;net &#187; internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ndmckinney.net/category/international/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net</link>
	<description>In the Army now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 4 (Beta 8) First Impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2010/12/28/firefox-4-beta-8-first-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2010/12/28/firefox-4-beta-8-first-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2010/12/28/firefox-4-beta-8-first-impressions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a couple hours of playing with the latest Firefox on my Mac, I&#8217;ve come to a conclusion: Mozilla has Google on the brain. The browser is certainly quick, but I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m going back to it. Safari and Google have stolen my heart. The Good: Loads pages quickly; provides me a way to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2010/12/28/firefox-4-beta-8-first-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Complies with European Comission for 2 Months</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/08/02/microsoft-complies-with-european-comission-for-2-months/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/08/02/microsoft-complies-with-european-comission-for-2-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 10:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article 82]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/08/02/microsoft-complies-with-european-comission-for-2-months/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Longer than anyone thought, but still a poor showing nevertheless. [From Microsoft kills Windows 7E, puts IE back in upcoming OS - Network World]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/08/02/microsoft-complies-with-european-comission-for-2-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Inquires About Google Voice App Rejection</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/31/fcc-inquires-about-google-voice-app-rejection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/31/fcc-inquires-about-google-voice-app-rejection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/31/fcc-inquires-about-google-voice-app-rejection/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechCrunch is reporting that the FCC has sent letters of inquiry to Apple, AT&#38;T and Google regarding the rejection of Google Voice related apps from Apple&#8217;s app store. In the letters, the FCC is asking both Apple and AT&#38;T about their levels of decision making in approving/rejecting apps. AT&#38;T has maintained that it has no [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/31/fcc-inquires-about-google-voice-app-rejection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pros and Cons of Asymmetric Cryptography</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/15/pros-and-cons-of-asymmetric-cryptography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/15/pros-and-cons-of-asymmetric-cryptography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/?p=737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quick disclaimer: I love cryptography. I don&#8217;t fully understand the math that goes into it, but I love it all the same. Something that has baffled me for quite some time is why we don&#8217;t see more cryptography in consumer computing. Passwords, simple authentication tokens, are ubiquitous, even on single-user Windows computers. Real encryption, on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/15/pros-and-cons-of-asymmetric-cryptography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Kills Old Technology?</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/14/what-kills-old-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/14/what-kills-old-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/?p=733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was much, much younger, I was online. Every summer, I would spend a couple weeks with my grandparents. My uncle, a professor of computer science at a nearby college, secured for me a spare computer, a modem, and user account. A handshake later and I was connected to the network. A further authentication [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/14/what-kills-old-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Network Really is the Computer</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/09/the-network-really-is-the-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/09/the-network-really-is-the-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/?p=729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sun Microsystems, one of the stalwarts of the computing industry, has a simple motto: &#8220;the network is the computer.&#8221; Yesterday, Google took that motto to an entirely new level with the announcement of it&#8217;s Chrome OS. Details on Chrome are sparse (which has not stopped technology writers from writing ad nauseum about all the features [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2009/07/09/the-network-really-is-the-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O Hai</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2008/08/26/o-hai/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2008/08/26/o-hai/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2008/08/26/o-hai/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love that flickr is so friendly.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2008/08/26/o-hai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google almost ready to acquire DoubleClick</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/12/20/google-almost-ready-to-acquire-doubleclick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/12/20/google-almost-ready-to-acquire-doubleclick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doubleclick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/12/20/google-almost-ready-to-acquire-doubleclick/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a number of news sources, the FTC stated today that it will not oppose the proposed acquisition of DoubleClick by Google. The proposed deal, at US$ 3.1 billion deal would make Google the largest internet advertising company in the world. However, the European Commission has not yet ruled on whether or not Google&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/12/20/google-almost-ready-to-acquire-doubleclick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Honest Journalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/18/honest-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/18/honest-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/17/honest-journalism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Either way, I'm curious whether or not major (and minor, for that matter) media publications should disclose when they make changes of any sort, no matter how innocent, after publication.</p>
<p>...My question is this: is it better to have a full disclosure policy (à la Boing Boing), a limited disclosure policy (the Reuters model), or to simply make changes and hope no one notices (the <span style="font-style: italic;">Slate</span> way)?</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/18/honest-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ecto 3 Alpha</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/13/ecto-3-alpha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/13/ecto-3-alpha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/13/ecto-3-alpha/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just downloaded the alpha release of Adriaan Tijsseling&#8217;s ecto blogging software. It&#8217;s a revamped version of ecto2, although &#8220;ecto3 is not ecto2&#8243;. Among the new features, ecto3 includes a new rich-text editor, as well as support for a number of other blog APIs. That&#8217;s about all I have right now. I&#8217;m just posting to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/08/13/ecto-3-alpha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transmit is the worst FTP product ever.</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/01/06/transmit-is-the-worst-ftp-product-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/01/06/transmit-is-the-worst-ftp-product-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 02:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/01/06/transmit-is-the-worst-ftp-product-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you visit my site recently, you might notice the look has changed. This is because the FTP client, Transmit, has deleted all the content of my WordPress directory when I tried to update it today. My content stayed intact (it&#8217;s in a database elsewhere), but all my themes, plugins, and add-ons have been destroyed. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2007/01/06/transmit-is-the-worst-ftp-product-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the Point of Blog Spam?</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/12/18/whats-the-point-of-blog-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/12/18/whats-the-point-of-blog-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 05:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/12/18/whats-the-point-of-blog-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve more or less declared victory in the war on blog spam. Using some nifty filters, I&#8217;ve been able to catch automated posts on my site and prevent them from being posted. Like email spam, I&#8217;m having a hard time figuring out what the point of it all is. I have two theories why people [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/12/18/whats-the-point-of-blog-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Does This Work?</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/11/19/why-does-this-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/11/19/why-does-this-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our declining culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pointless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/11/19/why-does-this-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC is reporting that internet scams from Nigeria are costing the UK billions of pounds. How in the world is it possible that this still works? I&#8217;ve never even seen one of scam letters before. How exactly does all this work? &#8220;Dear Sir: I don&#8217;t know you, and you don&#8217;t know me. But if [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/11/19/why-does-this-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Enemies of the internet&#8217; named</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/11/07/enemies-of-the-internet-named/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/11/07/enemies-of-the-internet-named/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/11/07/enemies-of-the-internet-named/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The group Reporters Without Borders [Reporters sans frontières, or RSF] has published their annual list of countries that are &#8216;enemies of the internet&#8217;. RSF states that the countries on this list are openly hostile to free speech on the internet. The list of countries, in alphabetical order, is as follows: Belarus Burma China Cuba Egypt [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/11/07/enemies-of-the-internet-named/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Cleanup</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/09/26/draft-cleanup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/09/26/draft-cleanup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DC Metro Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/09/26/draft-cleanup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will be the 201st entry on my website since moving to my current hosting company. I&#8217;m rather proud of my achievement, since I honestly didn&#8217;t expect to write as much as I had. While 200 posts seems like a lot, there were many more entries that were never written. Most of the unwritten posts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/09/26/draft-cleanup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I like Slashdot better than Digg</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/14/why-i-like-slashdot-better-than-digg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/14/why-i-like-slashdot-better-than-digg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/14/why-i-like-slashdot-better-than-digg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many conduits by which information travels about the internet. Two of the largest sites on the internet are Slashdot and Digg. Both sites bring news and information about technology. Slashdot is moderated; Digg is not, opting to be run solely by its readership. For this reason alone, I will always prefer Slashdot to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/14/why-i-like-slashdot-better-than-digg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like MacGyver, But for Food</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/13/like-macgyver-but-for-food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/13/like-macgyver-but-for-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/13/like-macgyver-but-for-food/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re like me, you don&#8217;t go to the grocery store very often.  You&#8217;re usually left with a few odd ingredients.  What to do?  Consult Snacksby.  If you&#8217;re hungry and are too lazy to make a trip to the grocery store (or your local Chinese restaurant), type into Snacksby&#8217;s search engine a list of whatever [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/13/like-macgyver-but-for-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I miss the old Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/02/i-miss-the-old-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/02/i-miss-the-old-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 04:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/02/i-miss-the-old-internet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is quite a bit of talk about the &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; and the &#8220;next generation of internet services&#8221; floating around lately, especially among the popular media. All this talk has, for whatever reason, made me nostalgic for internet technology of yesteryear. Many of these old technologies were simple, effective, and certainly useful today. For example, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/08/02/i-miss-the-old-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The War on Content Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/05/31/the-war-on-content-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/05/31/the-war-on-content-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 18:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our declining culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/05/31/the-war-on-content-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My site has been attracting a lot of content spam lately. Most of it has been caught by my filtering software, so, until recently, there has not been any real problem. Yesterday, I wrote about the issue of network neutrality. That post, it seemed, attracted a lot of attention. I received several comments, but something [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/05/31/the-war-on-content-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/05/29/network-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/05/29/network-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 03:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/05/29/network-neutrality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the most impressive technology to evolve in the 20th century is the internet. The internet has evoked a number of great metaphors about being the great democracy, the only true free press, and so on. However, the internet is also a business, and once Al Gore finished &#8220;inventing&#8221; the internet, the money began to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ndmckinney.net/2006/05/29/network-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

